:: eyedot ::: images information ideation ::

:: EYE (anatomy), light-sensitive organ of vision in animals.
:: EYE (verb), to look at to look at something or somebody inquisitively.
:: EYE (noun), an ability to recognize and appreciate something; a point of view or way of thinking.

[::..archive..::]
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
September 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
[::..political..::]
:: media matters ::
:: watchblog ::
:: cost of war clock ::
:: doctors w/o borders ::
:: hungersite ::
:: second harvest ::
:: working assets ::
:: democracy now! ::
:: common cause ::
:: ACTIVISM LINKS ::
:: daily mojo ::
:: gary hart ::
:: this modern world ::
:: people tree ::

[::..comix..::]
:: get your war on ::
:: scary go round ::
:: get fuzzy ::
:: explodingdog ::
:: penny arcade ::
:: homestarrunner ::
:: dieselsweeties ::
:: orneryboy ::
:: perry bible fellowship ::
:: butternutsquash ::
:: this modern world ::

[::..music..::]
:: WFMU streaming radio ::
:: accuradio ::
:: 20minuteloop ::
:: bjork ::
:: onelovehiphop ::
:: erp ::

[::..random + cool..::]
:: boingboing ::
:: fark ::
:: mit ocw ::
:: abebooks ::
:: ursula k leguin ::
:: jon cornforth photos ::
:: sylvia ::
:: lucas krech blog ::
:: noodlebox ::
:: lot47films ::
:: nakd ::
:: lynn fox ::
:: nooflat ::
:: jeff bridges blog ::
:: novica ::
:: ugly dolls ::
:: gama-go ::
:: presstube ::


:: 10.31.2003 ::  



Well, this is interesting. I did a Google search the morning for "California signatures redistricting" after hearing part of an NPR report about a guy who's collecting signatures for a voter referendum that would take redistricting powers away from the very people the process tends to benefit - the legislature. Among the sites found was this one, a document put out in 2001 by the California State Assembly Republican Caucus on "redistricting issues."
The Burton example highlights the most important reason to avoid gerrymandering - politicians using the redistricting power to thwart the will of the voters. An unfair gerrymander undermines the electoral system, breeds distrust among the voting public, and poisons relations between the political parties. Over the next few years, California will spend millions of dollars overhauling its election equipment and procedures in the wake of the 2000 presidential election. A gerrymander will render that reform futile. Political outcomes will be assured far ahead of time without any input from the voters at all.

There are also practical reasons to avoid gerrymandering. Dividing cities, counties, and communities of interest breeds confusion among voters and makes it difficult for legislators to effectively represent local interests. Keeping communities of interest united within the same district respects the geographic and political integrity of California. Using common-sense criteria also limits the ability of map drawers to play games with the political process.

Redistricting is the most political act undertaken by the Legislature. It is a highly partisan exercise that requires many months of negotiation between Republicans and Democrats, the Legislature and the Governor. It can advance, or end, political careers. [emphasis added]
The above could as easily have been written by Texas Democrats in the wake of the recent redistricting debacle. The CA Republicans make an interesting suggestion later in the document:
The third option is a lawsuit. Democrats may attempt to split minority communities in order to strengthen their own fortunes. Doing so may be a violation of the Voting Rights Act, which requires the Legislature to respect minority communities of interest. Furthermore, the new plans must respect current majority-minority districts. If minorities lose voting strength due to the new redistricting plans, a situation called "retrogression," a court can overturn the Legislature's plan. Republicans may also have cause to sue if Democrats fail to respect the California Constitution's requirement for districts to respect the "geographical integrity" of cities, counties, and other communities of interest.
Switch "Democrat" and "Republican," and replace "California" with "Texas" and you've got a decent strategy for the Texas Democrats.

I almost laughed aloud when I read this last part:
If the Democrat-dominated legislature conducts redistricting in its traditional way - limiting participation, holding last-minute hearings, striking backroom deals - they will have to deal with the legal and public relations difficulties that would cause. Bringing redistricting out into the open exposes and opens up the proposed maps for comment and criticism. This is a goal the Assembly Republican Caucus should strive for.
Wow, the irony of it all.

:: Deb 10:11 AM :: permalink :: [0] comments :: ::


Comments:



Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?