:: eyedot ::: images information ideation ::

:: EYE (anatomy), light-sensitive organ of vision in animals.
:: EYE (verb), to look at to look at something or somebody inquisitively.
:: EYE (noun), an ability to recognize and appreciate something; a point of view or way of thinking.

[::..archive..::]
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
September 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
[::..political..::]
:: media matters ::
:: watchblog ::
:: cost of war clock ::
:: doctors w/o borders ::
:: hungersite ::
:: second harvest ::
:: working assets ::
:: democracy now! ::
:: common cause ::
:: ACTIVISM LINKS ::
:: daily mojo ::
:: gary hart ::
:: this modern world ::
:: people tree ::

[::..comix..::]
:: get your war on ::
:: scary go round ::
:: get fuzzy ::
:: explodingdog ::
:: penny arcade ::
:: homestarrunner ::
:: dieselsweeties ::
:: orneryboy ::
:: perry bible fellowship ::
:: butternutsquash ::
:: this modern world ::

[::..music..::]
:: WFMU streaming radio ::
:: accuradio ::
:: 20minuteloop ::
:: bjork ::
:: onelovehiphop ::
:: erp ::

[::..random + cool..::]
:: boingboing ::
:: fark ::
:: mit ocw ::
:: abebooks ::
:: ursula k leguin ::
:: jon cornforth photos ::
:: sylvia ::
:: lucas krech blog ::
:: noodlebox ::
:: lot47films ::
:: nakd ::
:: lynn fox ::
:: nooflat ::
:: jeff bridges blog ::
:: novica ::
:: ugly dolls ::
:: gama-go ::
:: presstube ::


:: 11.10.2004 ::  



Stolen Election
To believe that Bush won the election, you must also believe:

- That the exit polls were wrong;
- That Zogby's 5pm election day calls for Kerry winning Ohio and Florida were wrong (he was exactly right in his 2000 final poll);
- That Harris' last-minute polling for Kerry was wrong (he was exactly right in his 2000 final poll);
- That incumbent rule #1 - undecideds break for the challenger - was wrong;
- That the 50% rule - an incumbent doesn't do better than his final polling - was wrong;
- That the approval rating rule - an incumbent with less than 50% approval will most likely lose the election - was wrong;
- That it was just a coincidence that the exit polls were correct where there was a paper trail and incorrect (+5% for Bush) where there was no paper trail;
- That the surge in new young voters had no positive effect for Kerry;
- That Kerry did worse than Gore against an opponent who lost the support of scores of Republican newspapers who were for Bush in 2000;
- That voting machines made by Republicans with no paper trail and with no software publication, which have been proven by thousands of computer scientists to be vulnerable in scores of ways, were not tampered with in this election.
The above was a quote from a poster named 'TruthIsAll' on the DemocraticUnderground.com forums, found on the truthout site.

My inital reaction to hearing that yes, there was election fraud, particularly in key states like FL and OH, was "well, Bush won by enough votes that it probably doesn't matte." But I checked last week's reported election results against this page and came up with this:

Bush won FL by less than 400,000 votes. The expected tally for counties using optical scan machines ((% registered Republicans)*(total votes counted) vs. (% registered Democrats)*(total votes counted)) was 1,337,242 to 1,432,425; the final tally was 1,950,213 to 1,445,675. So while Bush was expected to lose in those counties by 95,183, he instead won by a landslide of 504,538 votes.

This was of course more than enough to offset the results in counties that used e-voting machines (which received a lot more attention than optical-scan), which returned a Kerry win with the expected margin of about 100,000 votes.

Doesn't that seem just a little bit fishy? And doesn't it show that proving election fraud could actually make a difference?

:: Deb 3:10 PM :: permalink :: [0] comments :: links to this post ::


Comments:



Post a Comment


Links to this post:

Create a Link

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?