:: 10.26.2006 ::
Here's my question. How can the Administration present an argument based on moral relativism to justify blocking the use of federal funds for stem-cell research, and yet when it comes to say, our tax dollars financing the use of military force, or the implementation of the death penalty, suddenly that argument does not apply? At least with the left-hand side of the debate, all murder is wrong - it's the definition of murder that comes into question; i.e., first- and second-trimester abortion is not murder because an embryo or a 14-week-old fetus is not a viable form of life, but the death penalty is state-sponsored, first-degree murder (motive: revenge).
Link found here.
:: Deb 10:42 AM :: permalink ::
 comments ::
Links to this post: